How reliable is the model of fly ash locations created to form the conclusions in the report?

The report says that it used the construction drawings to determine the location of the fly ash on the site. The construction drawings do not show the actual location of the fly ash. This has led to some confusion about the reliability of the conclusions in the report.

The most important data regarding the fly ash is the amount (approximately 1.5 million tons) and the general distribution. Since we used a distribution pattern which covered the width of the golf club, the model should be accurate and scientifically reliable without knowing the exact locations. The anomaly found in data results from the southwest corner of the site may be explained by the hills on that corner which may contain fly ash.

Show All Answers

1. Will proposed new drainage ditch on the south side of Murray Drive diminish the ability of drainage ditch on the south of the golf club to accept contaminants from the site?
2. If the drainage ditch to the south of the golf course is dry, will it continue to accept contaminants from the site?
3. How reliable is the model of fly ash locations created to form the conclusions in the report?
4. The drainage ditch on the south side of the golf course runs across my property, does that mean my property is contaminated?
5. Why hasn't the City looked at other neighborhoods to the south and west of the golf club and performed testing?
6. What is the status of the Greenhaven/Murray Drive drainage improvements?